Call us today: 646-820-0224

RICO – Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act

RICO

In 1970, Congress enacted the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act know as the RICO Act or simply RICO.  At a time when large scale, violent organized crime had run rampant, the Act was intended to give the government a significant tool in prosecuting the individuals who ran the operations, but rarely directly participated in specific crimes.  As time has passed, the RICO act has been used to prosecute huge groups of people involved in mob activity, street gangs, biker clubs and even some corporate organizations.

The white collar criminal defense attorneys at The Henry Law Firm PLLC have successfully represented individuals and organizations charged with violations of RICO.  Because of the complex nature of RICO, an experienced attorney is required to challenge every aspect of the crime charged.

RICO is codified in 18 U.S.C. 1961-1968. 18 U.S.C. 1962(c), the most commonly used section, makes it a crime for:

[A]ny person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.

18 U.S.C. 1961 defines a “pattern of racketeering” as at least two racketeering acts where at least one of the acts happened after the RICO statute was passed and the last of which was committed within 10 years of the prior after the prior act.  The 10 year time period excludes periods of incarceration.  “Racketeering Activity” is defined by a list of 35 crimes – 27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes – that includes violent and non-violent crimes.

A person may also violate RICO through a conspiracy.  18 U.S.C. 1962(d) makes it a crime to violate RICO through conspiracy.  Unlike a substantive violation of RICO, a conspiracy to commit RICO may not require proof that the person personally committed two racketeering acts.  For example:

When defendant agrees to participate in conduct of enterprise’s affairs with object of violating substantive Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) provision, it is not necessary for defendant to agree to personally commit two predicate acts in order to establish required pattern of racketeering activity[.]
United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530 (11th Cir. 1991)

However, if a person engages in a “single objective conspiracy,” not the overarching RICO conspiracy, the requirement of proving a pattern of activity may only be met by specifically proving an agreement to commit two racketeering acts.

Additionally, double jeopardy does not apply in many instances even if an individual has been convicted and served a sentence for a crime that serves as a racketeering activity under a separate RICO indictment.  This is especially true where a defendant’s prior conviction was the result of one of the eight enumerated state crimes that serve as racketeering activities.  Some argument on this front was suggested recently in a case by the United States Supreme Court where the dissent stated:

The double jeopardy proscription is intended to shield individuals from the harassment of multiple prosecutions for the same misconduct. Green v. United States, 355 U. S. 184, 187 (1957). Current “separate sovereigns” doctrine hardly serves that objective. States and Nation are “kindred systems,” yet “parts of ONE WHOLE.” The Federalist No. 82, p. 245 (J. Hopkins ed., 2d ed. 1802) (reprint 2008). Within that whole is it not “an affront to human dignity,” Abbate v. United States, 359 U. S. 187, 203 (1959) (Black, J., dissenting), “inconsistent with the spirit of [our] Bill of Rights,” Developments in the Law—Criminal Conspiracy, 72 Harv. L. Rev. 920, 968 (1959), to try or punish a person twice for the same offense? Ordinarily, a final judgment in a criminal case, just as a final judgment in a civil case, should preclude renewal of the fray anyplace in the Nation.

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Valle, 579 U.S. __ (2016).

Punishment for RICO violations can be severe.  In many instances a sentence under RICO it is predicated on the guideline level for the underlying offense.  Thus, if you are convicted of a RICO conspiracy involving murder the sentence can be extremely severe.

There are many arguments related to RICO that can and should be made in Court.  It is important to seek the counsel of an attorney with experience in defending RICO prosecutions.  The complexity, severity and sheer amount of work involved requires dedication and careful attention to detail.

Call The Henry Law Firm PLLC immediately at 646-820-0224 if you are facing federal RICO charges. A strong defense can be the difference in the case.

 

What to Do If You Are Facing a Money Laundering Investigation

According to experts, around $5 trillion is money laundered around the world each year, and law enforcement authorities recover only a small fraction of that money. But, in spite of this gap – and quite possibly because of it – U.S. law enforcement authorities take an extremely hard line in pursuing the money laundering investigations that do end up on their radar, and it is often tertiary and unsuspecting individuals and entities that find themselves in the crosshairs of a money laundering investigation. While we might think of large banks and other financial institutions when we think of money laundering, it is common for business partners, service providers, art and antique dealers, auction houses, trustees, directors and board members, and all types of financial service providers to get caught up in a money laundering investigation. It is certainly frightening to get a visit, call, or other inquiry from a federal agent or agency – or even to hear rumors of those close to you being approached – but what you do next can have enormous implications for your future.

Understand That Criminal Liability Can Exist Even If You Were “Ignorant”

Again, federal law enforcement takes a very aggressive approach to policing money laundering, and they do this for a number of reasons. One is that it is often more feasible for law enforcement to collect evidence of financial crimes than the crimes that produced the money being laundered, such as international trafficking. Law enforcement can also approach those who may played a secondary and/or unwitting role in the money laundering and use methods to intimidate them and their businesses that might lead them to the persons committing the crimes from which the money profits flowed.

Unlike with many other criminal laws, prosecutors do not have to show that a person willfully (in other words, intentionally) violated federal laws on money laundering in order to secure a conviction. Using the concept of “willful blindness,” prosecutors can successfully argue that a person is guilty of money laundering when he makes efforts to conceal the profits of criminal activity even if he did not know the money was the product of illegal activity but had strong reason to suspect it was. For example, an art dealer facilitating transactions on behalf of a wealthy drug dealer to conceal profits might be charged with money laundering if it can be shown there was a reason to suspect the nature of the funds.

Furthermore, anyone who merely encourages or assists such a transaction (e.g. service providers) could potentially be liable even if he or she was not a primary party to the transaction.

Do Not Wait to Speak With a Criminal Defense Attorney

Does this mean every person connected with a transaction involving money derived from illegal activity is criminally liable? Absolutely not, but it does mean that prosecutors can find a way to pin criminal liability on persons in ways they may well not have imagined. Thus, it is a mistake to speak with law enforcement – or any other non-attorney for that matter (any conversation you have not protected by a privilege may be used against you) – without an attorney under the impression that you have nothing to worry about.

By speaking with a criminal defense attorney experienced in federal investigations at the first sign of a money laundering investigation, you can take steps to determine what your potential criminal liability might be (which may be none, but better to find that out in a confidential consultation with an attorney who represents only your interests), and work with that attorney in communicating with law enforcement to reach your best possible outcome, which can include a dropped investigation or favorable agreement.

Contact a New York Defense Attorney Today

The Henry Law Firm PLLC provides criminal defense to individuals and businesses throughout New York in all state and federal investigations and prosecutions. If you believe you may be under investigation for money laundering, do not hesitate to contact us today to schedule a confidential consultation regarding your matter.  

FAQ: Tax Fraud Penalties

Can I be charged with a crime if my taxes are done incorrectly?

Yes. Not only can the IRS can hand down civil penalties for improperly doing your taxes, federal prosecutors can charge you with a tax-related crime if you fail to file a tax return, provide false or fraudulent statements to the IRS, or willfully evade paying your full share of taxes.

What are the criminal penalties for failing to file a tax return?

You face up to one year in prison and up to $100,000 in fines (or up to $200,000 in the case of a corporation). These penalties also apply when a taxpayer fails to pay taxes on time or fails to supply information to the IRS.

What are the criminal penalties for making fraudulent or false statements to the IRS?

You face up to three years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines (or up to $500,000 in the case of a corporation). Making fraudulent or false statements can apply to statements made in your tax return or to government officials.

What are the criminal penalties for tax evasion?

You face up to five years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines (or up to $500,000 in the case of a corporation).

What is the difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance?

Tax avoidance is the legal process of taking advantage of strategies allowable by the tax code to reduce your taxes. Tax avoidance is therefore legal. Tax evasion is using strategies not allowed by the tax code to reduce or eliminate the taxes you pay. Tax evasion is illegal.

What are common methods of tax evasion that can result in criminal penalties?

  • Failing to report income from a side job
  • Failing to report income from rentals
  • Failing to report income paid in cash
  • Overstating deductions that do not exist, such as charitable donations not actually made

What if a person makes a mistake on their tax returns?

If you negligently make a mistake, then you still may owe civil penalties, but the government cannot convict you of a crime unless it was willful on your part. The standard of proof in showing willfulness is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Can I be charged with a crime for assisting another person or entity in tax fraud?

Yes, as with most crimes, you can be charged with a tax-related crime as an accomplice if you assisted and/or encouraged another person to commit tax fraud.

Contact a New York Criminal Defense Attorney Today

The Henry Law Firm PLLC provides criminal defense to individuals and businesses throughout New York. Contact us today to schedule a confidential consultation regarding your matter.  

Do I Need My Own Lawyer in an SEC Investigation?

If your employer is being investigated by the SEC, then you likely have some questions about the SEC investigation process but may not feel comfortable asking them of your supervisor or co-workers. This is understandable, as an SEC investigation can mean significant civil penalties such as fines, permanent career and reputational damage, or loss of a job. One of the most common questions employees of a company under SEC investigation ask is whether they need their own lawyer, and they often trip themselves up by asking the wrong people to answer that question.

Your Company’s Attorneys Cannot Tell Whether You Need a Lawyer

When an employee learns that an SEC investigation is occurring, it is common for the employee to ask the HR director, the General Counsel, or even an outside law firm representing the company whether the employee needs his or her own lawyer. First, it is critical to understand that all of those people are there to serve the interests of the company, not you the employee.  Thus, it is not their job to be concerned with whether you would be better off from a legal perspective by having your own attorney.

In addition, they might not have any idea what your role in potential SEC violations were and thus whether it would serve your interests to have your own attorney or not. If company attorneys are speaking with you about events related to a potential SEC investigation (also note that the company attorneys are likely not under any obligation to tell you whether an investigation is indeed occurring or not), there is a good chance they know less than you do about potential violations at that point and are indeed speaking with you to gather that information, thus making them even less likely to be able to answer that question accurately.

The Company Attorneys Represent the Company, Not You

Beyond the issue of presenting the question of whether you need your own attorney to company lawyers, regardless of what they might say to you, the fact of the matter is that those attorneys represent the company and not you. Simply put, their allegiance and duties are directed towards representing the company’s interests, and that will always be their overriding mission.

Does this mean they are out to get you and will ultimately throw you under the proverbial bus in an SEC investigation? Not necessarily, and the company (and by extension, its attorneys) may have a strong interest in defending, so long as your interests are aligned with those of the company.

But, when push comes to shove, it is the case that they are not there to defend your interests and formulate legal strategies to protect your reputation, career, and future. In many cases, companies under SEC or other federal investigation can curry favor with law enforcement by showing that they are taking a hard line against employees in the company who have violated laws, and so penalizing and/or terminating an employee can be an action a company takes on the advice of its attorneys to reach a favorable outcome with the SEC. And this outcome may be reached on the basis of information you as the soon-to-be terminated employee provide to the company and its attorneys under the mistaken impression that doing so would help your interests.

Contact a New York White Collar Defense Attorney Today

Thus, if you have reason to suspect you face negative consequences in an SEC investigation of your employer, it is wise to reach out to your own white collar investigations attorney to discuss your options in a confidential setting. The Henry Law Firm PLLC provides white collar defense in SEC investigations to individuals and businesses throughout New York. Contact us today to schedule a confidential consultation regarding your matter.  

Other Practice Areas

White Collar Defense and Regulatory Enforcement

We defend public officials, executives, board members, securities brokers, traders, law enforcement personnel, and employees facing criminal charges, internal investigations and regulatory enforcement actions.

learn more

Criminal Appeals

Our attorneys have successfully appealed to The United States Supreme Court and other federal appellate courts throughout the country.

learn more

Federal Criminal Defense

We represent individuals who have been charged with or are being investigated for a full range of federal crimes nationwide.

learn more

Contact Us

address

535 Fifth Avenue

Suite 2520

New York, NY, 10017

social channels

  • twitter-icon
  • in-icon
  • in-icon

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee future outcomes.